**GG2U built its reputation on a single boast: that it pays more per video and per offer than most of the competition.
Reading through long running member threads and testing the platform ourselves, that claim survives contact with reality more often than it fails, but only on a narrow slice of the site.
The video wall genuinely prices well against comparable platforms.
The rest of GG2U, from its interface to its manual review queue, feels frozen somewhere around 2015. Whether it belongs in your rotation depends entirely on which part of the site you plan to use, and this review works through it wall by wall rather than taking the marketing line at face value.**
The claim in the site's own marketing
GG2U LLC markets itself as one of the highest paying offerwall aggregators available, open to members Worldwide.
That is a specific claim, and specific claims are checkable against what members actually report cashing out.
The honest answer is that GG2U's video advertising partners do pay noticeably better rates than the video walls bundled into larger, flashier competitors.
Video networks buy attention in bulk, and GG2U appears to have negotiated a better cut of that spend than some rivals.
Where the claim falls apart is on general offer inventory, which draws from the same handful of aggregators used by Freecash, Gain.gg and a dozen others.
On those shared offers, GG2U rarely prices meaningfully above the pack.
So the claim is true for one activity and misleading if you read it as covering the whole site.
That distinction matters more here than on most reviews in this category, because GG2U's whole pitch rests on it.
Offerwall by offerwall: what each section is actually worth
GG2U bundles several distinct offerwalls under one dashboard, and treating them as a single average hides where the money actually is.
- The video wall. This is the platform's genuine strength. Short ad views credit quickly and pay a fraction of a cent to a few cents each, and stacked over a session that adds up to a rate above most competing video walls. It is repetitive work, but it is the most reliably priced section on the site.
- The general offerwall. App installs, account signups and free trials, sourced from the same aggregator pool as most of the category. Prices here track the market rate rather than beating it. Read the requirement line before starting, since "install and reach level five" pays far less per minute than "install and complete tutorial."
- The survey router. A modest panel feed that behaves like every other router in this category: a fair number of screenouts, occasional high value fits when your demographic matches, and no way to predict in advance which survey will actually pay out.
- The daily bonus and loyalty section. Small, close to negligible, worth clicking through in under a minute but not worth building a routine around.
A worked earnings example
Take a one hour session split across the platform, which is roughly how an efficient member reports using it.
Thirty minutes on the video wall at a typical rate of one to two dollars an hour yields fifty cents to a dollar.
Twenty minutes spent filtering and completing two general offers, one paying around a dollar for a five minute app install and one paying nothing because it fails a screening step, nets roughly a dollar.
Ten minutes attempting a survey that screens you out after question three earns nothing.
Total for the hour: somewhere between a dollar fifty and two dollars, which sits in the normal range for a mid tier platform and confirms that GG2U's advantage is concentrated in the video wall specifically rather than spread evenly across the site.
Cashing out: rails, thresholds and the review queue
The minimum withdrawal is around $5 through PayPal, with some gift cards clearing lower. Bitcoin, Amazon and Steam round out the available rails.
None of that is unusual for the category, and it puts GG2U roughly in line with the mid tier of platforms covered on our platforms directory.
What is unusual, and what generates most of the negative chatter on GG2U's own forums and on independent reviews sites, is the manual review queue.
Small cash outs process quickly.
Anything above a few dollars, particularly a first withdrawal or one built on higher value offer completions, can sit in review for several business days.
That is not automatically a red flag.
Manual review exists specifically to catch fraud and chargebacks before they cost the platform money, and every platform in this category runs some version of it.
GG2U's version is simply slower and more visible than most.
Reader warningWarning. Do not build up a large balance on GG2U before testing a withdrawal. Cash out early and small, confirm the payment clears, and only then decide how much of your time this platform deserves.
Support and how disputes actually get resolved
When a video or offer fails to credit, GG2U's support queue is the slowest part of an already slow platform.
The process that works: take a screenshot the moment the activity completes, note the exact timestamp, the offer or video identifier if one is shown, and the device you used.
Submit that through the support ticket form rather than a general contact address, since tickets tagged to a specific offer get routed faster than open ended messages.
Expect a reply measured in days rather than hours, and expect to be asked for the same evidence again if the first agent cannot locate the transaction.
Persistence, not politeness or urgency in your wording, is what moves a stuck ticket along on a platform this size.
Account safety notes
Use a password you have not reused elsewhere, since GPT platforms are a common target for credential stuffing precisely because members often reuse logins across low value accounts.
Keep your registered email current, because that is the channel GG2U uses for withdrawal confirmations and any manual review requests, and a missed email is a common cause of a withdrawal appearing "stuck" when it is actually waiting on you.
Do not use browser extensions that promise to automate offer completion, since that kind of tool is exactly what triggers the manual review flags described above and can get a balance frozen pending investigation.
Points to cash, and what a decent hour looks like
GG2U's points convert to cash roughly in line with the wider category, and the number that actually matters is the hourly rate you achieve on the activities you choose, not the conversion rate printed on the site.
On video, expect somewhere in the range of a dollar or two an hour in our testing, which sits above the video walls on several larger competitors.
On general offers and surveys, expect the same wide range as everywhere else, roughly fifty cents to a couple of dollars an hour, with the occasional well priced install worth several dollars for less than an hour of setup.
The factor that moves you within that range fastest is not effort, it is selection.
Skim the highest paying items, skip anything with a vague requirement, and stop when the remaining inventory drops below what your time is worth.
Where GG2U's video wall beats and loses to competitors
Against platforms like Rewards1 or ySense, GG2U's video rates hold up well, and members who specifically hunt video content report better returns here than on either.
Against the larger aggregators for general offers, GG2U rarely wins on price, though it occasionally wins on offer availability in markets where a competitor has thinner coverage.
The practical conclusion, which applies across this entire category and not just to GG2U, is that no single platform wins every category.
Holding accounts on two or three and price checking before you start an offer beats loyalty to any one brand.
If you want a structured way to compare offerwalls directly, offerwalls explained is a useful primer, and which offerwall pays most breaks down the actual checking process.
The complaints that show up again and again
Reading through user reports and the discussion threads on our own forum, three complaints recur about GG2U far more than any others.
The interface feels abandoned. Navigation is dated, mobile use is awkward, and finding the highest paying activity requires more clicking than it should.
This is a genuine usability cost, not a scam signal, but it does slow down efficient use of the site.
Support response times are slow, as described above.
Larger withdrawals sit in review longer than members expect. This is the most common single complaint and the one most likely to make a first time user think something has gone wrong.
It usually has not. It is simply the price of a smaller platform running manual fraud checks on a stretched team.
None of these three complaints describe a platform that fails to pay.
They describe a platform that pays slowly and with friction, which is a different and much more common problem in this category than outright non-payment.
Who GG2U actually suits, and who should skip it
GG2U suits someone who specifically wants a better rate on video content and is willing to tolerate a dated interface to get it.
It also suits someone already running two or three accounts who wants a secondary option to check prices against before starting a general offer.
Skip it if you want a single, primary platform with deep inventory across every category, or if you are impatient about withdrawal timing, or if you specifically dislike repetitive video ad viewing since that is the section carrying most of the platform's value.
A platform with broader inventory such as Freecash or a faster paying option covered in GPT sites with instant payout will suit those readers better.
Frequently asked questions
Is GG2U actually the highest paying offerwall? Only for video. On general offers it prices in line with the rest of the category rather than above it.
Why is my withdrawal stuck in review? Manual fraud checks, which run longer on larger or first time withdrawals.
It is a normal part of the process, not automatically a sign of a problem.
Can I use GG2U alongside other platforms? Yes, and most efficient members do, using GG2U specifically for video and another platform for general offers or surveys.
The verdict
GG2U is a narrow specialist wearing a general purpose platform's branding.
The video rate claim is largely true and worth having in your rotation for that reason alone.
Everything else on the site is ordinary, slowed further by a review queue that tests patience more than it should.
Treat it as a secondary account, cash out early to confirm the rails work for you, and let the video wall do the work it is actually good at.
If you have used GG2U and want to compare notes with other members, our reviews and ratings page is the place to post what you actually experienced, good or bad.
Real payout reports are more useful than any single review, including this one.
